When was deferred action approved

Ming H. Maria A. Additionally, the applicant would need to have graduated from a high school in the United States, or obtained a GED; demonstrates good moral character; pass a criminal background review. Once conditional residency was established, and the applicant had been a resident for six years, the applicant would be able to apply for permanent residency by demonstrating: attendance at a post-secondary educational institution, or service in the United States military for at least 2 years or received an honorable discharge; pass additional background checks; continued demonstration of good moral character.

The DREAM Act instigated much discussion on the status of minor children brought into the United States who are unable to establish permanent residency and who face deportation to their country of origin, despite the child having lived in the United States for many years.

Many framed the issue as protecting children from the consequences for actions over which the child had no control, while others framed the Act as a reward for illegal activity that would create an incentive for minor children to enter into the United States illegally.

Under a directive from the DHS secretary, these youth may be granted a type of temporary permission to stay in the U. July 20, — On July 16, , a U. The court also emphasized that its decision should not be interpreted as terminating any existing grants of DACA. The federal government has announced that it will appeal this decision to the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals. Please check this webpage for updated information. Batalla Vidal, et al. Already, the administration has scaled back the policy through issuing the Wolf memorandum.

We should cement the contributions of Dreamers, not keep them at risk of deportation. What is DACA? Who are Dreamers? Is DACA still in place? Yes, but its days may be numbered. How did the Trump administration respond to the Supreme Court decision? What are the requirements of DACA? To be eligible for DACA, qualifying young undocumented individuals are required to demonstrate the following : that they came to the U.

August 3, : Judge Bates issued an opinion upholding his April 24, decision allowing DACA renewals, but partially stayed the order regarding new applicants. Read Judge Bates' opinion here.

April 24, : Federal Judge John D. Bates of Federal District Court for the District of Columbia ruled that DACA protections must stay in place and that the government must resume accepting new applications. The judge stayed his decision for 90 days and gave the Department of Homeland Security, which administers the program, the opportunity to better explain its reasoning for canceling it.

Read the Supreme Court's response here. Read Judge Alsup's order here.