Plagiarism refers to which of the following

Plagiarism is applicable for writing or website articles, but it is also applicable in stealing intellectual property like music, images, videos, and even choreography of a dance.

Plagiarism can fail a piece of work trying to serve its primary purpose. Therefore, the students or artists must not plagiarise, neither deliberately nor accidentally. As per the plagiarism definition, plagiarism means stealing intellectual property or intellectual fraud.

When you use parts of writing or artwork without crediting the original writer or artist, then plagiarized work is considered. The meaning of and how we define plagiarism has changed gradually with time. Nowadays, it is effortless to find plagiarized content, and many students tend to change the parts of the work or substitute words with synonyms. This is also a form of plagiarism. Therefore, a student or writer must be careful about plagiarising any article.

It is better to work on fresh ideas, and if you are willing to substantiate your opinion, you must use proper quotation marks and citations. If someone reuses his own work again without the permission of the professor, it will be considered self-plagiarism. In the case of publishing , the writer must keep in mind that the citation must include all the works he is utilizing as a reference, even if the work is a previous work of the same writer. Otherwise, they may end up plagiarising themselves.

Academic institutions take self-plagiarism seriously, and that can affect the grade of the student. But what does plagiarism mean for you in terms of the impact it could have on your grade? First, this will be an instance of academic misconduct, and therefore the student may get a bad degree or even probation as a result. What about images, videos, and music? Copying media especially images from other websites to paste them into your own papers or websites.

Composing a piece of music that borrows heavily from another composition. Re-creating a visual work in the same medium. Re-mixing or altering copyrighted images, video or audio, even if done so in an original way.

Related Resources Is it Plagiarism? My Teacher and I Don't Agree. If students copy or adapt code from another source, they must attribute or cite it. The common practice is to include an inline comment in the code itself. The inline comment not only gives proper credit to the author of the original code, but also helps with understanding and potential debugging.

For example:. Plagiarism in the arts is complex. Thus in the widest sense the history of borrowing in music is the history of improvisation, composition and performance. Nevertheless, there are numerous examples of plagiarism or copyright infringement within the sphere of music. In April , a judge ruled that there was enough evidence for a lawsuit against members of Led Zeppelin to move to trial. Within the traditional Art Academy, the act of copying the work of the Masters is a recognized method of artistic training.

However, it is important to educate students when copying for technical skill and understanding is appropriate in the educational setting and what their creative, ethical role is as a professional artist and designer.

For more information on methods to prevent visual plagiarism, please see our pages on Talking about Academic Integrity and Effective Assignment Design.

Original Passage If we are to take Tolkien's work as he wrote it and as he clearly wanted his audience to read it—as a true mythology, with all the layering and multiple narrators and overlapping texts and variant versions that characterize mythologies in the real world—then we must allow that, like those real-world mythologies, all the parts, even the apparently inconsequential ones, are in the greater service of the whole.

The correct answer is b "Use the work of another and misrepresent it as your own. This is plagiarism because you are deliberately trying to suggest that the clever idea or wording was your own creation, which is a lie, and, of course, plagiarism. This is plagiarism. You always have to give a reference when you quote specific words or passages from another source - and you must put the author's words within quotation marks to indicate that you are doing this. Note that quoting is usually done more in the arts and social sciences than in the sciences and is usually best done 1 when the words quoted are the best, most memorable, or most succinct way of expressing the information, 2 when you are referring to an original text that you are writing about - as in a close reading, or 3 when the words are those of an acknowledged master or authority in the field.

The correct answer to this question is c. It is not necessary to cite information that is common knowledge. One of the ways to judge if something is common knowledge is to ask yourself if everyone in the field would know this information or if no-one would argue against it. For example, it is common knowledge that Pierre Trudeau was Prime Minister of Canada in the 's, so you would not have to cite that information.

However, if you wanted to say that until the energy crisis beginning in , with its attendant inflation, he had continued the old economic policies of previous Liberal governments - then you would need to cite your source. Remember, that the data that others create are the result of their own work, and are like a kind of intellectual capital.

The originator must be credited for his or her own work. An additional reason to give credit is that the fact that someone else's research supports your argument makes your thesis stronger, so it is to your own advantage to cite the author's name.

The correct answer is to this question is c. One of the ways to judge if something is common knowledge is to ask yourself if anyone in the field would know this information or if no-one would argue against it.

However, if you wanted to say that until the energy crisis beginning in , with its attendant inflation, he had continued the old economic policies of the Liberal governments that had gone before him - then you would need to cite your source.

A chart is like any other data. Remember, that the data that someone else creates is the result of their own work, and is like a kind of intellectual capital. In addition, that someone else's data supports your argument makes your thesis stronger, so it is to your own advantage to cite the author's name.

You're on the ball. Since a bibliography is a list of all the works used when doing your research, it might, therefore, quite legitimately include works that you did not specifically cite in the text of your paper, but which were helpful to you as background studies. This term is more often used in the arts and social sciences than in the sciences, which would probably conclude a research paper with "References," or "Works Cited" pages.

These last two formats list only the works actually cited in the paper. By doing this you are intentionally trying to deceive the reader of your paper and to make him or her believe that you have done more work than you really have done.

This is considered to be academic misconduct.