Which is better rapidweaver or iweb

Overall Opinion: Most medium to large sized businesses have to rely on servers to store their information, but recent years have seen a sizable shift towards cloud computing as a method of server storage. This allows users to eliminate the need to maintain a dedicated server room and cut back on the duties overseen by their IT department, but it also creates a more secure storage space for their data and allows information to be shared more easily across increasingly non-centralized business models.

Their fully features suite of cloud services lets you achieve a variety of goals through a partnership with a single and reliable provider. The wealth of applications you can achieve with iWeb's dedicated servers are impressive. On the client side end of things, iWeb provides for a reliable means to host websites, ensuring peak performance for your users while providing a secure and stable experience. Their services are suitable for both private users looking for a no-hassle method for managing their website and web hosting providers looking to juggle a complicated constellation of different sites.

But once you start to dig in to the back end business features of iWeb, the service really starts to shine. Their private cloud services are a great choice for businesses with multiple freelancers or off-site employees, as it allows them to get access to your virtual private infrastructure wherever they happen to be. They can also help you set up your databases and improve the speed of applications run in multiple instances over your virtual network.

The scaled pricing structure means that iWeb services are even suitable for non-business users. The speed and performance of their services make them an ideal fit for voice over internet protocol services, video streaming, and dedicated online gaming.

If you're looking for a more efficient way to store your data, iWeb can assist you. Their networked storage solutions mean that you'll have access to the information you need when you need it without having to worry about prying eyes intruding on your private data.

All of their cloud storage solutions integrate smoothly and easily with Windows and Linux environments, so setting up and maintaining your server won't be a problem. Of particular note is the customer care team working behind the scenes at iWeb. They're a software as a service provider, and reliable and consistent support is understandably a critical component of their business model.

Pros: Affordably priced, especially for larger businesses Responsive and high-quality customer care team Smooth integration in both Windows and Linux operating environments. Cons: Pricing is less feasible for individuals or smaller businesses Quality of the network is sometimes inconsistent.

This page was composed by Alternative. It was created at and last edited by Alternative. This page has been viewed times. Featured products and services advertise here. RapidWeaver vs. Learn more This report shows the usage statistics of Wix vs. See technologies overview for explanations on the methodologies used in the surveys.

Minification removes all the unnecessary characters from the code without changing its functionality. There was one comment that a developer had had problems exporting an entire site until he turned off 'minify CSS and JaveScript'. Consolidation and minification together aim to improve webpage download speeds. The presumption is that each webpage is in a separate uniquely named folder such as ….

The idea is that the server will serve 'index' pages first anyway, and thus it does not need to be specified given that the only webpage in the folder is called 'index'. As far as I can tell this type of link i. Obviously 'cruft' refers to some extra stuff in a link that is not needed. Because if we always name our webpages 'index…', then browsers will always load that page first, so as the saying goes we can 'strip the fluff' from the links. It inserts a default filename extension to files such as 'index.

However the tip is to use. Whilst I don't really understand what is so special about. This provides a number of options that are valid across all the webpages on the website. The key change I made to the template was to remove side-bars from all the webpages, thus exploiting the entire width of the page and screen. The other options I took were to 'justify' text, to deselect uppercase for navigation menu options, and to install the 'back to top' button. I did not use this option because I don't find it an elegant solution for many of the smaller average-quality images I have embedded on my webpages.

The last thing I did in 'Master Style' was to increase the visibility of the links, by changing the colour and intensity settings. Folders and Filenames It is useful right at the beginning to have some clear ideas about how to organise the folder structure for the website. In fact the suggestion is to rename the folders to make titles self-explanatory and the folder structure easier to understand. Experts also remind us to have 'Tidy Links' on in the Advanced… settings under 'General Settings' remembering that 'Tidy Links' only works when the pages are named index.

I've seen comments suggesting that search engines like a nice structural and consistent navigation menu i. Above we have what we might call a 'native' or 'out-of-the-box' file structure for a set of simple test pages.

We can see that inside each page folder e. The point being made here is that the file structure in not intuitive. We can also see that the image names are unhelpful. What we need is an easy to understand file structure that is both simple and informative. Let's take an example. Part of this website will be dedicated to visiting different places sites, museums, etc. Here we have a page 'index. So all we have to do is change the folder name in the webpages 'inspector' and RapidWeaver will build the folder hierarchy accordingly.

Now we change the filenames to the more intuitive ones, and re-publish. If we were to look at the server we would now see both sets of folders and files. So a re-publish with a different folder name does not replace the old folder. All the more reason to plan ahead and decide on a workable and easy to understand folder hierarchy. Just as a marker to which we will return, we also need to ensure that we have a good 'Bowser Title' and a good description in the 'Meta Tags', that we put a 'title' on all links, and that we describe properly the Filename and Alt Tag on all the images used.

And I will also mention here the importance of 'Headers' in the webpage text. These are also meta tags and are looked at by the search engines, even if they are said to attribute a lower value to their content as compared to 'Browser Title'.

Nevertheless it is important to make 'Headers' useful in the context of the webpage, but not to spam them with too many keywords. In addition there should be only be one 'Header 1' and it should be at the beginning of the webpage.

Long webpages should be broken into a logical structure using 'Header 2' and occasionally 'Header 3'. You can test to see if Google can crawl your webpage using Fetch. Google has a Search Console with Fetch, and with two other tools, one to generate a crawl error report , and the other a search analytics report.

You have to register and sign-in to use the tools. The two sections important for us are General Settings and Meta Tags. It is the most important meta tag on a webpage so I try to ensure that it is unique, distinctive, descriptive and containing keywords that help understand the subject of the webpage.

Many experts suggest that the keyword should appear in the first words of the 'Browser Title', and it best to keep to a maximum of two keywords per title. The 'Browser Title' or title tag I've also seen it called meta title is also displayed on a search engine results page.

The 'Browser Title' is the boldest, most obvious element in a search result and plays a major part in convincing a searcher to click through to a particular webpage i. In that sense it is important for usability, even if it is not that important to ranking by the search engines presumably too easily manipulatable. It nevertheless helps both user and the search engines understand the subject of the webpage. The 'Browser Title' is more important that the webpage header, and if possible they should not contain the same keywords to avoid an oop or ' over optimisation penalty '.

One comment was to put the main and secondary keywords in the first 60 characters because Google generally displays only the first 60 characters or more exactly pixels of the title in the search results.

The 'Browser Title' also appears in the browser page tab, and therefore a good keyword at the beginning of the title helps users see what the page is about even when they have several webpages open at the same time. It was also noted that long browser titles were not penalised, but filling them full of keywords and in particular repeating the same keywords could be penalised.

Another expert simplified things by saying that Browser or Page Titles are for search engines, and Webpage Headings are for human readers. Strictly speaking this is true, but the 'Browser Title' is what a searcher sees on a results page, and the text used hopefully will convince a searcher to click through to the webpage.

Here are a few examples of good 'Browser Titles' taken from here. And below are the bad examples. In the first case the keywords Burger and London are not at the beginning, and there is no compelling pitch to pull the searcher to click through. In the second example the keyword 'Nike' has dropped off the end, and the inconsistent capitalisation makes the link look spammy.

The third example is more complex, but it is bad to start with a negative connotation pushing the keyword away from the beginning of the title, and the title was the same as the webpage header.

These mistakes make the difference between being on the first page of search results, and being on the 4th page. My example was somewhat different. In addition, originally I had put the same text in the 'Browser Title' and in the 'Meta Tag Description', but in fact both should be different and made more descriptive.

Several experts talk about meta content , with a focus on what to put in the 'Browser Title' and in the 'Description' field under 'Meta Tags'. But a 'Description' should only appear once, so put it under 'Description' and leave the 'Tags' option empty. Just as with the 'Browser Title' the 'Description' is important because it appears as a ' snippet ' under the webpage URL in search results. In the good and bad examples of 'Browser Titles' we can also see good and bad examples of 'Descriptions'.

The experts tell us to make the 'Description' compelling, appealing and as relevant as possible, but above all it must match the content on the webpage. Keywords are important but don't over do it, and above all make sure the 'Descriptions' on the different webpages are truly different different webpages should not have the same 'Description'.

A last point often mentioned by experts is the use of ' rich snippets ', which are things like review results, well-known people, products, businesses, recipes, music, events, and video content which can be added to a webpage. These 'rich snippets' help the search engine understand the information presented on a webpage, and their markup can be used to present a richer search result.

I'm not there yet, but who knows some day … More on Meta Tags Meta Tags are 'data about data' and are used to described the webpage contents, keywords, the author of the document, when last modified, etc. In fact there are 's of different meta tags but we need only to looks at a few, such as 'title', 'description', 'subject', 'language', 'author', 'url', 'coverage', 'distribution', 'rating', … of which most are self-explanatory.

The reality is that today meta tags are of less importance than in the past, the search engines are good at reading and understanding HTML and are far less reliant on the meta tags. The obvious meta tags are: 'keywords' - Google tell us that keywords serve no positive purpose whatsoever, in fact they are often seen as spam, and a webpage or website can be penalised for over using or misusing keywords so don't use the keyword meta tag 'description' - Google tells us that descriptions are not that useful because they can extract descriptions from the HTML document, but it is suggested that every page should have a different meta description, and they must be truly descriptive, well written, unique page descriptions no duplications of keywords but use the character space In RapidWeaver there are two places to put meta tags with their content descriptions.

The first is 'Code' under 'Settings', and the other is in the webpage specific 'Inspector' under 'Meta Tags'. Code in Settings has a section for meta tags that are valid for the entire website and which are written on each and every webpage. Other experts suggest to put it in, but everyone knows that since Google does not look at 'author' anyway.

A few experts even suggest linking this meta tag to a separate webpage about the author and why they created the website. Other meta tags that have their uses but which I don't use are 'copyright' which might even point to a webpage on the website copyright rules, 'url', 'coverage' and 'distribution'.

If I were to use these meta tags they would all be valid for the entire website and appear in the HTML header of every webpage. The reality is that I can't find any compelling reason to use these additional tags. One of the first meta tags that comes to mind is ' title ', which is in fact an independent HTML tag. And here we have a problem, because we have the 'Browser Title' in the webpages General Settings and 'title' as a tag in the section on Meta Tags.

As I understand it the 'Browser Title' adds the 'title' meta tag, and as such we should not use both 'title' tags so I just use the 'Browser Title'.

I am very light on skills about publishing in general. Could you please elaborate a little about the precise place in RW that I put in a foldername of my own choosing.

I can not make it work. Thanks a lot. But it is still not working. I have attatched a couple of screenshots. And one showing a FTP view of my Website right after publishing a few minutes ago - and as you can see there is no such folder, and the file index.